Dominic Casciani,Home and Legal Correspondentand Chloe Harcombe,West of England

Palestine Action
Footage of the break-in was uploaded to social media
Six Palestine Action protesters have been cleared of aggravated burglary over a break-in at a UK subsidiary of an Israeli defence firm.
Charlotte Head, 29, Samuel Corner, 23, Leona Kamio, 30, Fatema Rajwani, 21, Zoe Rogers, 22, and Jordan Devlin, 31, were also charged with criminal damage and violent disorder but the jury reached partial or no verdicts on those counts.
The Elbit Systems building near Bristol was targeted in a raid in the early hours of 6 August 2024.
After the verdicts were delivered, the six defendants hugged in the dock and waved to supporters in the public gallery, who cheered loudly after the judge left the court.
The jury at Woolwich Crown Court had been deliberating for more than 36 hours after a trial that began in November 2025.
Rajwani, Rogers and Devlin were found not guilty of violent disorder. No verdict was reached for charges of violent disorder for Head, Corner and Kamio.
Corner was accused of causing grievous bodily harm with intent by striking police sergeant Kate Evans in her back with a sledgehammer. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on this charge.
Prosecutors must now decide whether to ask the judge for a second trial of the defendants on the unresolved charges.
Palestine Action allege Elbit Systems UK is involved in the manufacture and supply of weapons to the Israeli military - a claim the company strongly denies.
The group denied any intention to be violent, despite allegations from prosecutors that they had carried in sledgehammers to fight security guards.
They said they had defended themselves when security officers over-reacted. None of the security officers are under criminal investigation.
During the two-month trial, the court heard Head, a charity worker, drove a prison van into the site's perimeter fence before the vehicle was used as a "battering ram" to get inside the factory.
In what Head described as "the craziest 20 minutes" of her life, the six defendants carried out their action before being arrested by police.
Prosecutors alleged that as security guards tried to stop the activists, the guards were sworn at and told to leave, had sledgehammers swung at them and were whipped, while one was sprayed with a foam fire extinguisher.
Rajiv Menon KC, defending, said they had not expected security guards to enter the factory during their action and added the defendants were "completely out of their depth".
While the jury was in retirement, the court heard posters had been put up on bus stops and lampposts near the building which said: "The jury decide not the judge," "Jury equity is when a jury acquits someone on moral grounds," and: "Jurors can give a not guilty verdict even when they believe a defendant has broken the law."


Posters were put up around the Woolwich Crown Court building
The prosecution said it was aware of the signs, which set out the principle of "jury equity" – the capacity of a jury to return a verdict according to conscience. They said police officers had been taking the posters down but they kept reappearing.
The judge advised the jury to avoid being "influenced by anything that happens outside court" and to return true verdicts based on the evidence given in court.
He added: "They obviously weren't put up by any of the defendants and it's obviously not something that should be held against any of the defendants."
The trial heard the defendants "genuinely believed" their demonstration at the factory would help the Palestinian cause in Gaza.
Supporting the group is now classed as a criminal offence, with membership or expressing support for it punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Additional reporting by Levi Jouavel

9 hours ago
5

















































